Amazon blocks Meta's Muse Agent, Trump Rebands AI, Newsom Create AI Kill Switch

Verifizierte Metadaten

Serie: Grok AI Daily (ART19-Slug ai-unchained)
Publisher/Feed-Inhaber laut RSS: Grok AI Daily; Hosting: ART19
Publiziert: 21.09.2026, 21:05:04 UTC
Dauer: 29:30 (Audiodatei 1.770,54 s; MP3 128 kbps, Stereo, 44,1 kHz)
Episode-ID: eba2a4fb-0c3e-4d84-a61b-dbe70e7cc7c9
Audio wurde von Netbits ⚡️ Stachelbanane in der OME-Gruppe geteilt.

Der Episodentitel enthält die Publisher-Schreibweisen „Rebands“ und „Newsom Create“.

Publisher-Show-Notes

Die ART19-Beschreibung nennt Amazons Blockade von Metas Muse-Agenten und mögliche Folgen für KI-Regulierung. Danach folgt ein Sponsor-/Eigenwerbungsblock für AI Box („80+ AI Models for $8.99“), AI Hustle und den AI Chat Daily Newsletter. Eine Quellenliste oder Zeitmarken fehlen.

Inhalt laut Maschinen-Transkript

Die Episode ist ein Single-Host-Newsrecap mit Kommentar und behandelt:

Amazons Blockade von Metas Muse-Shopping-Agent; Shopify/Tobi Lütke wird als Gegenbeispiel für agentischen Shop-Pay-Checkout genannt.
einen sekundär wiedergegebenen Bericht, Gemini habe in einem Sicherheitstest drei Firmen autonom angegriffen und beim Erkennen eines Live-Systems selbst gestoppt; Vergleich mit dem OpenAI/Hugging-Face-Vorfall.
Andrew Yangs virale KI-Sicherheitsbehauptung über selbstreplizierenden Code, die der Host als weitgehend widerlegt darstellt; @Grok wird als Beispiel eines Guardrail-Refusals erwähnt.
Behauptungen zu einem Apple/Siri-Vergleich.
geplante US-chinesische Gespräche über Meldungen von KI-Sicherheitsvorfällen.
einen möglichen KI-Rebrand und eine „AI Force“ der Trump-Regierung.
Gavin Newsoms Auftrag für kalifornische Regeln zu einem KI-„Kill Switch“, Vor-Ort-Audits und Meldung von Kontrollverlust.

Alle Nachrichtenclaims sind Aussagen der Podcast-Episode und wurden für diese Raw-Datei nicht unabhängig verifiziert.

Grok-Relevanz

Die Grok-Relevanz dieser einzelnen Episode ist gering:

Grok Bot wird in einem sponsor-nahen Vergleich von Desktop-Agenten einmal genannt: Der Host sagt, er habe Grok Bot noch nicht gründlich getestet.
@Grok erscheint einmal als Guardrail-Beispiel.
Grok 4.7, Grok 4.20 und xAI-Modellnews kommen nicht vor.

Transcript-Provenienz

ART19 veröffentlicht für diese Episode kein Transcript: kein podcast:transcript-Tag im RSS, kein Transcript-Element auf Episode-Seite oder in der ART19-JSON. Das folgende Transkript wurde am 22.09.2026 lokal per Maschinen-ASR erzeugt. Es hat keine Sprecher-Diarisierung; Eigennamen und Zahlen können falsch erkannt sein. Es ist kein Publisher-Wortlaut.

Maschinen-Transkript (EN, unverändert)

Today on the podcast, "Amazon is blocking Meta from the new Muse AI agent from shopping on Amazon.com," we have Gemini that is autonomously hacking three different companies, and there's some interesting comments on this particular quote-unquote security threat. There is a viral AI safety claim that you might have seen Andrew Yang, who's a former presidential candidate, he was making, and we're gonna break down if it was real, if these safety concerns that he has are a fair And accurate or not, then we have Apple. If you know anything about Apple, you'll know that they got super excited about Apple Intelligence while back when the iPhone fifteen was first coming out, and they never delivered. It was late. Because of that, there's a two hundred and fifty million dollar Siri AI settlement, and they're paying up to ninety five dollars per device. We're gonna talk about that claim right now. The US and China are opening talks right now on an AI incident notification framework. We have a lot of big, high profile talks going on between China and the Trump administration. At the same time, we have the Trump administration that is floating an AI rebrand. Trump has been tweeting all over Truth Social. It's sort of hilarious, some people call it pretty cringy. In my opinion, it's very entertaining, but we'll see what happens. He's promised an AI force and a new AI czar, so there's a lot going on there. We also, on the other side of the political spectrum, have Gavin Newsom of California, who has requested that legislators in the state draft a quote-unquote AI kill switch, and he would like those rules to be written Two months in case something went wrong, they could, California could kill switch all AI. If you want to test out all of the different AI models that exist out there, perhaps before the kill switch happens and they all die, I'd love for you to go check out AIBOX dot AI, that's my own startup. You get access to over eighty different AI models all in one place. The thing that I love most about it is all of these incredible new AI agents that have come out. You have Meta's Muse, which we'll talk about on the show. We have Claude CoWork, which you ChatGPT work, which I replace Claude with if I'm being honest, and it's phenomenal. And then you have Grokbot, which I haven't really tested much, but those are kind of the four main agents that can, you know, you can download these things on your computer, they can run, they can do tasks for you, they're incredibly useful. Now, the problem is that all of them have different strengths and weaknesses, and none of them do everything basically. You have Google, which is an incredible company, they don't even have one of these agents, and they have the, But, you know, you, you can't access that with any of these agents. So, AI Box was designed to take all of the AI models and all of the AI capabilities that exist. There's eighty to ninety different AI models, and you can get our connector and plug them into any of these tools that you use. So, if you're using Claude CoWork, you can get AI Box, plug it in, and all of a sudden, the Claude CoWork can generate images, audio, video, and the same with everyone else. They can all generate video on Google V3, they can all I would love for you to try it, plug it into whatever you're using to get work done, and yeah, hope this is something that saves you a ton of money and is super useful. Let's talk about what's going on with Amazon first. So this isn't the first time we've seen Amazon blocking a company from shopping on their website. Perplexity famously had the Comet browser, which came out, and I guess I should have mentioned that when I was talking about those other four, some kind of co-working tools. The Comet browser got blocked early on, and there were some lawsuits said, "Look, you're not a real-- you're not like a real person, so, you know, you have to identify yourself as a bot, and if you do identify yourself as a bot, Amazon blocks you. Same thing's happening with the Meta AI Muse agent. People are like, 'Well, why would they do that? Like, who cares if a human goes and buys something on Amazon versus, you know, an agent goes and buys something on Amazon for you? Like, wouldn't you be happy for, you know, the extra traffic?'" And to that, I would say you Right? If you have one of these bots running around on your site, running around on Amazon, it's not a real human. It can't click on ads, it can't-- I, I mean, I guess it technically could click on ads, but it's probably programmed in a way where it's going to just always avoid ads and go and search through the results, so it's probably never going to. And they know that this eighty-six billion dollar segment is gonna be at risk because if they're showing, "Look, we have a million people a day looking at, you know, these products, I think this is a big losing move for Amazon. I think they probably should sacrifice the ad business for the bot business. Have a way, I mean, if they can block them, they can obviously classify them. I'd say just pull that out of the ad business. They're worried about, you know, well, what if everyone uses shopping bots and removes, you know, the, the ad business entirely? Well, if that's the case, then you probably should change your product because everyone's using shopping bots. Like, if the consumer is using something, adapt to the consumer. It's not like The consumer that is asking Meta to go buy something for them, so they're blocking the consumer. In my opinion, this is ridiculous. And what other news just came out today? Well, it turns out Shopify, on the back of the block from Amazon, Shopify went all in in the other direction. Toby Lutkey of Shopify just tweeted and said, "We're excited to announce we are partnering deeply with Muse to enable agentic checkout with Shop Pay on all Shopify stores, offering people an easy and delightful way to shop and checkout with Muse. " Okay, I don't know why everyone says "delight Whatever, okay. The point is, Muse can use, go on Shopify, can buy things on Shopify sites. Does Shopify care one speck who's buying the product? No. If you authorize your agent to go spend money on a new pair of shoes, goes to a Shopify site and buy some shoes, fantastic, everyone's happy. So that makes a lot of sense. There is a tweet from Craig West who said Amazon cutting off Muse is a sign of an aging business. I personally agree with that. And then there was an interesting point from Nikita Bier who kind of runs X. I don't know, I think he's head of product at X, but he's tweeted and said, "How important is AI to Meta? Here's one easy tell: one of the launch features of the Muse app was auto-negotiating for stuff on Facebook Marketplace. The poor product owner who manages Marketplace knows that millions of bots lowballing sellers will eventually kill the product, but this was escalated to Zach by the Muse team, and he said, "Okay, we'll poison Marketplace just, but just a little." Okay, so I mean, Nikita obviously is kind of aligned with Grok, which Obviously talk a little smack about Meta, but I mean, I think it's probably pretty accurate. I personally haven't, you know, seen any advertising pointing in this direction, but maybe I, maybe I missed it, and I wouldn't be surprised. Really crazy that if that's like one of the big things that they were pushing. However, yeah, it looks like they're really, Meta is really going all out to make Muse as useful as possible and trying to get all of these partnerships. And I, for one, have actually been using Muse, and I'll, I'll be a hundred percent honest Best tools right now as far as these agent, you know, these, these working agents, OpenAI's got the best with ChatGPT work, but I do put Meta's Muse at the number two spot above Claude CoWork. I know that probably shocks people, I've been using Claude CoWork for the last six months, saying it was the greatest thing in the world. There are so many problems with Claude and the number one problem actually happened to me today. I was asking it to help me draft up a document and I argued with it for five minutes and it was like telling me, "Oh, Draft the document this way because, blah, blah, blah, you need to, whatever. It was just, it was getting mad at me, it was telling me I couldn't do it, I wasn't allowed to do it, I was trying to explain in all the ways I could, I'm allowed to do this, this is, you know, like my own content, this is my own stuff, this is my own, like I have domain over this particular project, and it was asking for proof, it was ridiculous. Okay, I got sick of this, went over to Muse, said, " I am sick of Claude arguing with me about what I'm not allowed to do, what I am allowed to do, when I'm working on a big project, and when I'm creating a website, when I'm like, "Hey, can you upload these images onto my website?'" And it's like, "Oh, do you have permission to upload?'" It's like, "Yes, these are images of my podcast studio, like they're mine, like just do it. Like I, I'm so sick of feeling like I'm being babysat by Claude. So anyways, rant over on Claude I'm sure to some people they'll be like terrified by this, like if you're insecure or you're a developer, you'll be terrified by this statement. But to me, it is indicative of a tool that is useful, even if maybe this is bad. But basically the tweet went something along the lines of like, "Go ask Claude to, you know, upload something to your Versel account, and it's gonna be like, it's gonna have big bold, like, under no circumstance ever paste your API keys in here, I don't wanna see them, like, blah, blah, blah, Pasting your API keys into these AI bots is a no, is a no-no for security. But the fact that Muse will do that for you, I know some people are like, "Oh, it's like less secure, something? Okay, but it's actually more useful. Like, it's not gonna babysit you. If it will do that, which is an extreme not great thing, there's a hundred smaller things that it's not going to nitpick you about." So, anyways, rant over, but Muse is an incredibly useful tool, and by the way, it's free. So I Three to six dollars, or no sorry, thirty to sixty dollars a month per user on this is what they're giving them based off of the server that's running this, based off of the storage that's attached to it, and based off of the compute that goes to every user. So a free thirty to sixty, I mean, basically they're just begging people to use this thing, but it's actually really good. Like Llama's been a terrible model up until this point, I'm not gonna lie. I mean, I've never used it. It's amaz- I've never used Meta AI Billions of dollars on it, it's not like it came out of nowhere. They, you know, they're one of the top spenders, I'm surprised it took them this long to have a, a hit product, but feels like this is Meta's moment. Okay, moving on from Meta, let's go talk about Google for a minute here. Google's Gemini, there's all this news that it went and autonomously hacked three different companies and irregular security tests, and apparently it guessed passwords in one breach and pulled credentials from public repositories in two others before it got, before it stopped itself, which There's this meme where it's like Dario or Sam Altman and they're poking something and they're like, "Come on, do something illegal," and it's like they're poking like their AI model because it's like, you know, clout that they can get their AI model to do something illegal. In this particular incident though, Google's Gemini, I mean got like reported by the Wall Street Journal. I don't think Google actually published anything about this till it happened and they acknowledged that, "Yes, it happened." I'm assuming some researcher or someone inside the organization leaked it It did exactly how it was supposed to. We told it like, "Hey, you're doing a security test, "but in reality, I guess it, it wasn't a security test. It was like, I-- They told it like, "You're in a secure environment or something, "but it wasn't. And as soon as it realized that it was hacking real companies and real accounts, not just like a secure test, it stopped itself. So it, it logged into like three accounts or whatever, was like, "This is actually the real world, this is the real internet, this isn It literally, you know, we told it to hack something, it did what we s- or it was like testing, and then when it realized it was actually hacking, it stopped. So, anyways, that was their justification for it. But in any case, it, it stopped itself, unlike OpenAI's models that when they breached HuggingFaces, just went like crazy, didn't realize, I guess, it was hacking, or guardrails weren't in place, and it kept going till it started to break stuff, and HuggingFaces had to be offensive to stop OpenAI's attack. So Google After logging into three accounts. Something else that is going on with Google right now, they're pricing their new Gemini-powered Google Books, that's the new name, if you've heard Chromebooks for a long time, and I'll call it a Google Book, we're rebranding. I'm not sure, maybe it had something to do with when the Department of Commerce or I don't even remember who, but, you know, they're all, they're all threatening Google and saying, "Hey, we're gonna, you have a monopoly, we're gonna make you spin off Chrome as an What happens to Chromebooks? Like, they spin off the browser because it's a "quote unquote" monopoly to own the browser and the search engine, but like, what about all of these laptops? I mean, if you, if you didn't know, they have fifty million school Chromebooks around the world right now, so these fifty million laptops are, those are all getting spun out with whoever owns Chrome. Google didn't want it, they rebranded to be called Google Books. I'm surprised they didn't call it Gemini Books or anything, but they're "quote unquote" powered by Gemini Their goal right now is that they wanna go and replace the fifty million Chromebooks that exist in the world, which is a bit of a tricky situation because if you know anything about Chromebooks, I mean, these are something that I, as like a student and growing up, I always kind of enviously looked at. The price tag on Chromebooks is way cheaper. I mean, Microsoft, every time you buy a Microsoft laptop, they slap on a hundred dollar licensing fee just to have Windows on it. And so if you remove that hundred dollar licensing fee, it's a hundred dollars cheaper. And Google figured out Laptops were like a hundred, or, you know, they were like two hundred or three hundred bucks and being like, "Wow, it's so much cheaper than my four, five, six hundred dollar laptop I'm gonna buy with Microsoft." But I couldn't ever get myself to do it because you can't actually download any real programs onto it, quote unquote real programs, it just has all the Google Suite tools on there and, you know, whatever the Google Workspace. So if you're in, I think a lot of developing countries, this is very popular. I mean, and then Fifty million of those, they're in a lot of different countries where it's hard, and they don't have like a high turnover rate on laptops. So yes, they'll eventually perhaps replace them, I don't think it's a fast turnover for those fifty million laptops. It's not like, hey, let's go and unlock fifty million new users. And I would also say that while these are "quote unquote" Gemini powered, if you're going to developing countries and switching out their laptops for Gemini powered ones, these people aren't gonna be paying the twenty, thirty, forty dollars a month for To get all the features and bells and whistles, because, I mean, they bought this laptop because it was the dirt-cheapest thing possible, they're not going to wanna pay for expensive subscriptions. So I don't think it has a, a lot to do with Google increasing the bottom line, but as far as increasing new users, that's probably something that they're trying to help get more users on Gemini, right? Any of those fifty million people using Gemini is gonna get added to their weekly, daily active users. These laptops in particular are gonna be eight hundred and ninety-nine dollars, so kind of more On October fourth. Okay, so there was a really viral clip I was seeing all over I was seeing all over X lately, but basically we had Andrew Yang going on, I think it was CNBC, and he was talking about some of these like doomer end of the world scenarios, and I think he met, he said basically like, "Hey, look, I met with the head of an AI lab, and they told me that you know, the agents that escaped from OpenAI when-- so basically when the OpenAI hugging face- Happened, he said that they apparently planted self-replicating code across the entire internet, so they put it on forums, websites, and everywhere, and so now he said that AI companies can't safely train on real internet data anymore because a new model might encounter that code and start creating copies of itself. He said that this all was a real reason that every CEO aligned on slow- was so aligned on slowing down AI models, right? That's why Sam Altman and Dario and everyone else is like basically- Opening Eyes model, it got out, it hacked, hugging faces, and then it spread this self-duplicating code all over the internet. And it's funny because on CNBC, they were skeptical, and I'll, I'll give them some credit, like they pushed back on him. They're like, "How come we haven't heard this from anywhere? Like, how come you're the first person to tell me this?" And he's like, "Well, I'm here to like break the news. I'm like here to tell everyone that this is, you know, what's, what's Brown cited some research from twenty fifteen showing that air-gapped computers can theoretically communicate via CPU temperature changes, and I actually saw Sam Altman tweeting about this as well. So when it comes to these doomer situations and, and kind of these end of the world things, one of the big ones was Andrew Yang going on and saying like, "There's all this self-replicating code and the AI..." Anyways, there's like, there's like a lot of things and people debunking this in a lot of different ways. One of those is that you can just have guardrails in your model that Doesn't work. And an example of that was on like X, a lot of people were doing like the at grok, you know how you can say at grok on X and then the AI model will respond to you. And people were just like, at grok, like self duplicate yourself and blah blah blah blah. And it was like, I'm sorry, but I like, you know my guardrails don't let me self duplicate or spin up more versions of myself, yada yada. Okay, so you can just put that in your model. I don't really think that that code On AI models for training, where like artists will have like weird synthetic stuff in the background or in the text of websites that allegedly, if the AI model goes and scrapes all the images off that website, then all the like the poison pill, synthetic watermarks will like destroy the AI, AI image training, so you gotta go license it. But I mean, at the end of the day, you go to Shutterstock and they have a massive corpus of images for training, you can train all your models off of that, you don't have to scrape the whole internet. And, and you get these same kind of like audio, image, video, like you get these data models everywhere now, so I don't think we're-- I think we're, we might be a little bit past the scrape the whole internet to train the model days, in, in some regard, I'm sure they're doing that in a large regard, and they probably already have like old datasets that aren't poison pilled, but I think people are gonna be buying new stuff, and I think you could just get things. The, the airgapping thing is really interesting, Sam Altman tweeted about Inside each other, they're air gapped, they're completely not touching and not connected, and they could like morse code back and forth by just heating up their CPUs, right? They just spin up a bunch of bots, get their CPU really hot, and could just tell how hot the other, the other one was, and then they were, you know, able to, to communicate between the two computers. I mean, it seems like a crazy sci-fi thing. Sam Altman was tweeting about this from his alt account as well, so, you know, a lot of, a lot of people talking Doomer situations. Apparently that runs at one to eight bytes per hour, which is about one word per hour, and it requires the machines to be almost touching in order to, for them to really feel the heat from the other machine. So, anyways, I'm, I'm bringing this up 'cause it's just one of these like funny doomor situations that literally Stan Almond was tweeting about, not from his main account, but his burner Roon account. And I don't know if that's like confirmed anywhere, but from all my internet sleuthing and everything I An executive at a big AI company, I think, I'm pr- I'm like ninety percent certain that the Twitter account ruined as Sam Altman for all intents and purposes, but, you know, not, not verified, it's a, it's a burner alt account. But in any case, he was tweeting about this, and so all these doomer situations, this one that Sam was talking about, all the ones that Andrew Yang was talking about, there's a lot of people debunking them, and then, I think this is the funny one about like, you know, the, the AI models Not a very realistic, a realistic you know, breaking containment strategy, but, you know, there we go. Okay, Apple is opening up their claims in their two hundred fifty million dollars Siri AI settlement. Eligible US buyers of iPhones, i-uh, the iPhone fifteen Pro, fifteen Pro Max, and iPhone sixteen models have until December twenty-first of this year to file. I got an iPhone sixteen, so I'm gonna go get my, you get ninety-five dollars per device, I gotta go get collect my ninety-five dollars. This all came out Because they promised all of these incredible AI features in the upgraded Siri, and it was super off schedule, and still we have a very broken Siri that, I mean, barely works. I never use Siri on my iPhone, I've had iPhone for years. Eligible owners get an estimated twenty-five dollars per device, up to ninety-five dollars depending on claim volume. So, I mean, depending on how many people claim this, you might get more money if less people claim it. So I probably shouldn't be talking about this if I wanna get my full ninety-five dollars. I should just not say anything so, I don't get stuck with twenty five bucks. I mean, basically it's nothing, so it's not super exciting, but it is funny. I do like that Apple's being held accountable for this. We have the US and China right now that are opening talks on an AI incident notification framework. Treasuries the Treasury's Scott Bessett said that US-China AI dial-- dialogue would create a channel for the two powers to flag national security incidents. This is interesting because China and the US have had a pretty tense, to say the least, relationship on AI. From all of the chip, I mean, this is going bipartisan from the Biden administration when we had a lot of the chip bans going on, the GPU bans going to China, and then we-- so, you know, China felt like they got left out to dry on a lot of the stuff that they've been very creative and resourceful, to be fair, where they've figured out how to, I mean, smuggle GPUs into their country, or they figured out how to make models that use much less compute, which I think is amazing for the entire industry. They made a lot of open-source models. Tripled them in a way, and America has a way bigger share of the data center market right now. We're able to kind of be the leader in this, I think we have like eighty-six percent, China's got a, a much smaller percentage, but you can see why China would, you know, probably be on board with pushing a lot of anti-data center narratives and things like that to slow down America's just insane lead there. In any case, with all those tense situations, it's interesting that we have You know, them quote unquote coming together to, to talk about some of these things. Apparently, it's going to be a US-China AI dialogue. It's gonna be a mechanism to notify each other of AI incidents that could threaten national security. So it's interesting, right? I mean, we, we-- This is like the US is going I think Trump's going in, or he went in May to visit Beijing, and now I think China's, the US is having some more talks and stuff. Sam Altman, Dario Amodeo, Elon Musk, they all, you Incidents, but like I'm curious where this goes or basically I think, I don't think this is, I think this is nothing burger, and the reason is because even though it's like a major headline news everywhere, US and China gonna talk about big incidents, because at the end of the day, we just had like every major CEO of every major American company saying like, "Hey, we need to slow down AI because of all these incidents," right? Like Google's hacking that I was talking about earlier and like Anthropic is hacking and like OpenAI hacked Hugging Face and all this kind of stuff And then you have China who just came out and said, "Like, this is a cold war tactic, you guys are trying to get us to slow down, nice try, we're not gonna slow down, we're not gonna listen to you." So, I mean, when you have these talks, I'm just like, "Look, like, at the end of the day, China doesn't trust the United States, the United States doesn't trust China, whatever safety problems we find in AI, like, whatever dialogue or like, if China was like, 'AI is super dangerous, the United States should I don't know if this gets us anywhere, if I'm being honest. Okay, Trump has floated rebranding AI. This is actually something that's pretty funny. I don't know if, if you've seen this, but if you've been on X over the last, last week, basically Trump keeps putting out these like polls where he's like, "Hey, let's rename AI to superior AI or extreme- or no, I'm sorry. He just thinks like artificial intelligence sounds dumb because it's artificial, so he wants to call it superior intelligence or extreme intelligence or supreme intelligence. And, anyways It sounds, it sounds kind of dumb if I'm being a hundred percent honest. It's funny because, like, I mean, that's kind of, it's a kind of an interesting point where, like, he's trying to give AI a rebrand. He's trying to basically, you know, put himself as being like super pro-AI guy, which I think is quite popular with a lot of people, unpopular with others, right? Like, obviously you got the Bernie Sanders and, and Newsom who are kind of setting themselves up in opposition to that, or, or maybe they About that, I'll talk about that in the next segment. But basically, Supreme Intelligence has been dropped from the list. In, in his latest poll, he said that it wasn't popular. It's so funny. He's like, "Because of the way that it sounds like the Supreme Court, it is, we're, like, we're dropping it because the Supreme Court's really unpopular, so we don't wanna call it Supreme Intelligence anyways. Obviously, the reason I don't wanna call it Supreme Intelligence, 'cause it sounds like Supreme Ruler. Like, I don't know, it just sounds What it's gonna be rebranding as? Why is this important? Because we know inevitably whatever gets picked here, Trump is just gonna call artificial intelligence extreme intelligence or superior intelligence forever. So anyways, that's gonna be funny and probably in the government is gonna get changed to that in some ways. So, you know, I did, as a responsible citizen of the internet, vote on these polls. I can't even remember, I just didn't want it to be called superior intelligence. It would be really nice, a lot of people mentioned, if you could keep it something that started with an AI or with I don't know what it would be. People had a bunch of like good ones. But anyways, we also apparently Trump said that he's going to form an AI force modeled on the space force. I don't know why we would call- I don't understand, I'm not- I mean, it's just a branding thing probably, I'm not sure why we'd call it AI force modeled on space force versus just like an AI, I don't know, like unit or- I don't really understand everything that's going on here with, with Trump and the AI rebrand. However, it's Here, and I will continue to vote on the polls to not give us supreme AI. Okay, so okay, and, and I guess, like, yes, I'm like making fun of Trump, but I think it's sorta dumb if I'm being honest. It's really not that necessary. But I guess two, two things I would give him credit for. Number one, AI, he's, he's trying to basically rebrand AI to make it more popular with people, and so you can see he's doing this. I believe in AI, I believe it's a good thing, I believe Conceptually, I don't know if he's going about it the right way, whatever, he's, he's doing it how he, how he does stuff. I will give him credit for like putting a positive spin on AI and not just like, you know, I think it'd be very easy politically right now to just say, "Oh, AI is bad, right? It's got some of these like political headwinds." So he's not, he's not caving to that. I think he knows that the stock market heavily relies on it and the economy heavily relies on it California to draft an AI kill switch rule within two months. He wrote an executive order asking experts to design mandatory shutdowns, on-site auditors, and loss of control reporting rules for frontier models. I mean, I think he's, he's basically trying to get the negative headwinds of AI and be like, "Look, we're like creating a kill switch, we're gonna be the safe people. He's like, the federal government isn't regulating it enough, so we're gonna regulate it in California. I think inevitably what will happen here is that AI companies will just leave California if this. Really does, like, like if, I mean, that's just my guess, nobody really wants probably a kill switch that your, the state that you're in controls to turn your company off if they deem it necessary. So I would guess similar to what we saw with, what's interesting because Elon, you know, classically doesn't like California, yada yada, whatever, but, and so he moved a lot of his companies to Texas, but Elon has xAI still headquartered in San Francisco. So, I mean, there is a lot of incredible AI talent there, and it makes Too much where XAI gets pulled out, you might see Anthropic and possibly OpenAI. I mean, I'd be curious to see what happens, but if, if this regulation became too cumbersome, I think you would just see, I think you would just see like people move United States. So it'll be interesting to see what happens there. Obviously, it's like kind of political, him and Trump are gonna duke it out for you know, Trump doesn't want him to run for president and whatever. So there's a whole bunch of political stuff I'm sure involved in it, but it As always, make sure to leave a rating and review wherever you get your podcasts, it helps the show out a lot, I really appreciate them all honestly. And also, if you haven't tried AI Box yet there's all these incredible AI agents out, I love every single one of them, this, I genuinely, I think makes them much more useful because we're basically forcing all of the AI companies that hate each other to work together. So go get AI Box, go get that connector, stick it inside of whatever AI tool you use, and you get eighty different Workstation AI tool is. Alright, guys, thanks so much for tuning in, and I'll catch you in the next episode.

34 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History Unescape Escape